Dazbench Docs
The more AIs you run, the more the human becomes the bottleneck.
Each article answers one problem that shows up when you run Claude Code or Codex in parallel. It covers why it happens and where the usual fixes stop working, and Dazbench appears at the end as one worked example.
Keep track of AIs running in parallel
Run several Claude Code or Codex sessions at once and you lose track of who is doing what.
Stop being the one who decides what's next
If a human has to answer "what's next?" every time, the human becomes the bottleneck.
How do you stop telling Claude Code what to work on next?
A finished session does nothing until a person decides what comes next. The decision depends on knowing which prerequisites are done, and the only place that lives is our heads, so nothing moves while we are busy elsewhere.
Short answerHow do you manage task dependencies between AI agents without holding the order in your head?
Write the prerequisite on the work itself and derive startability from it every time. When a prerequisite finishes, everything behind it is released without a person handing out the next card.
Short answer
Carry context across sessions
Start a new session and the purpose, decisions, and acceptance criteria are gone. CLAUDE.md alone is not enough.
Hand off from the AI that thinks to the AI that builds
Every time you carry a ChatGPT decision into Claude Code, you repeat the same explanation.